← Silma

Reelyze alternatives for short-form video

Short version: this is the closest comparison on this site, closer than Virlo or Shortimize. Reelyze reads a video frame by frame, scores the hook, names the second viewers drop off, and ranks posts against the account’s own median. So does Silma. If you are looking for the feature that separates them, it is not the analysis. It is that Reelyze will then write your next script, and Silma will not.

Reelyze calls itself an AI growth system for short-form creators. Alongside the analyzer it ships Content Studio, which generates scripts with hook options, text overlays and captions, plus an AI chat coach, competitor tracking on paid plans, trending niche discovery and an Instagram Insights connection. It starts free.

Where they overlap

Almost everywhere, and pretending otherwise would not survive five minutes on their site. Both read the video itself rather than only its metrics. Both score the hook. Both explain drop-off with timestamps rather than handing you a chart and wishing you luck. Both track competitor accounts. Both surface trending posts in your niche.

The one that stings most to write: both rank posts against the account’s own median rather than raw views. Silma leads with that idea everywhere, and Reelyze markets the same thing with a 174x median example on its home page. It is a good idea, and it turns out it is not a moat.

Where they differ

Reelyze writes. Silma refuses to. Content Studio turns the analysis into a script, five hook options, overlays and captions. Silma stops at the verdict and the ranked fix list, and this is a decision rather than a gap in the roadmap. The people Silma is built for are not short of drafts, they are short of direction, and a tool that writes your hook has to be right about your audience in a way a tool that reads evidence does not. It is the brain, not the hands.

Reelyze is free to start. Silma is not. Reelyze gives you one analysis and one script without a card. Silma’s cheapest plan is $9 a month. On day one that is the single biggest practical difference between them, and if trying before paying matters to you, this page is not going to talk you out of it.

They meter differently. Reelyze sells you a number of analyses a month, tiered, with a competitor cap attached. Silma sells one pool of credits with no per-feature caps, so a week of heavy competitor research and a week of checking your own drafts draw from the same balance. Neither is better in the abstract. If your usage is lumpy, a pool tends to suit you; if it is steady and small, a fixed count is easier to reason about.

Silma has a done-for-you tier. Silma Studio is a person doing the strategy work rather than software. Nothing on getreelyze.com offers an equivalent.

Side by side

SilmaReelyze
Built forPeople already producing, whose bottleneck is directionShort-form creators, social managers, brands
PlatformsInstagram Reels, TikTok, YouTube ShortsInstagram Reels, TikTok, YouTube Shorts
Free tierNoYes, 1 analysis and 1 script, no card
Cheapest paid planLite $9/mo, 200 creditsCreator $19/mo, 20 analyses
Middle tierStarter $29/mo, 600 credits, 5 tracked accountsPro $49/mo, 60 analyses, 10 competitors
Top tierPro $79/mo, 1,500 credits, 15 tracked accountsStudio $149/mo, 200 analyses, API
How usage is meteredOne credit pool, no per-feature capsAnalyses per month, competitor cap by tier
Frame-level video readYesYes
Hook scoringYesYes
Drop-off explained by timestampYesYes
Ranked against the account’s own medianYesYes
Score a draft before postingYes, Pre-CheckYes, draft analysis
Competitor tracking5 or 15 accounts by plan2 to 10 accounts by plan
Writes scripts, hooks and captionsNo, by designYes, Content Studio
AI chat grounded in your own postsYesYes
API accessNoYes, on Studio
Done-for-you strategy tierYes, Silma StudioNot claimed

Reelyze prices, plan limits and feature names from getreelyze.com, read 8 September 2026, monthly billing. Silma prices from silma.app/pricing. Where a row says “not claimed” it means we did not find it on their site, not that we tested for it and it failed.

When to choose Reelyze

  • You want the script written. Content Studio is a real product and Silma has nothing like it, now or planned.
  • You want to try before you pay. The free analysis costs nothing and takes a link.
  • You want research and writing in one subscription rather than two tools and two bills.
  • You need API access at the top tier.

When to choose Silma

  • You already write your own hooks and do not want a machine’s draft in the way. You want the reason last week worked, not a script.
  • Your usage is lumpy. One credit pool handles a heavy research week followed by a quiet one better than a fixed monthly analysis count.
  • You track more accounts than you analyse. Silma Pro follows 15 against Reelyze Studio’s 10, at $79 against $149.
  • You want the option of handing the strategy to a person instead, through Silma Studio.
  • Price matters at every tier once you are past the free trial.

Other tools people put on this list

The same shortlist tends to come up. Virlo is the closest on discovery, compared here. Shortimize is the closest on tracking many accounts, compared here. Eden is a broader creator workspace, compared here. Instagram Insights and TikTok Studio are free and worth using regardless; they show your own account after the fact, with no cross-account baseline and no pre-publish check, which is the gap every tool on this page is selling into.

Same read, no ghostwriter. Paste a Reel or upload a draft and get the score, the drop points and the fixes. Lite is $9 a month, cancel any time. Check your first video →

Questions

Is Silma a replacement for Reelyze?+

For reading a video and scoring the hook, they do the same job, and this is the closest comparison on this site. The split is what happens next. Reelyze writes the next script for you through its Content Studio. Silma stops at the verdict and the fix list, on purpose. If you want the draft written, Reelyze does something Silma will not.

Does Reelyze compare a post against the account’s own baseline?+

Yes. Reelyze compares posts against the account’s own median when Instagram is connected, and its home page uses a 174x median example. This is worth stating plainly because it is the same idea Silma is built on, and it means the baseline maths is not what separates the two tools.

Which one is cheaper?+

Reelyze is free to try and Silma is not, which matters most on day one. After that Silma is cheaper at every tier: Lite $9 against Creator $19, Starter $29 against Pro $49, Pro $79 against Studio $149. The plans are not measured the same way, though. Reelyze counts analyses per month; Silma gives you one pool of credits you spend on whatever you want, where a pre-check is 5 credits and a full breakdown of a new reel is 12.

Why does Silma refuse to write the script?+

Because the people it is built for already have taste and already make the video. Video editors, in-house social managers and agency teams are not short of drafts, they are short of direction. A tool that writes the hook for you has to be right about your audience, and a tool that tells you why last week’s post beat its baseline only has to be right about the evidence. Silma takes the second job: it is the brain, not the hands.

Can I use both?+

You can, but they overlap far more than Silma’s other comparisons, so paying for both is hard to justify. If you want generation, Reelyze covers research and writing in one place. If you want a second opinion that never writes for you, Silma is the narrower tool. Picking one is the honest recommendation here.

Sources

  • Reelyze pricing, plan limits, feature names (AI Reel Analyzer, Content Studio, Reelyze Chat, drop-off explainer, competitor tracking, trending niche discovery, Instagram Insights integration) and the 174x median example: getreelyze.com, read 8 September 2026.
  • Silma plan limits and credit costs: silma.app/pricing; method: competitor analysis, Pre-Check, Discover.

Found something out of date? Email support@silma.app and we will fix it. Silma and Reelyze are not affiliated.